Treffer: On-The-Job Training and Learning: Formal Training versus Learning by Doing.

The paper looks at and compares two methods of on-the-job training: formal training and learning by doing. The former involves an intensive training period prior to the employee directly taking on the position for which he or she was hired for, while the latter, the employee begins immediately and is expected to learn on his or her own through experience over time. The former method allows less room for shirking but involves a period of investment in the form of the value of output or service that is effectively foregone as a result of the more resource-intensive training regime. Perhaps surprisingly, even if the formal training program does not significantly improve upon the probability of future success in production or service provision, formal training can provide higher net benefits to the training firm than learning by doing because the savings from the reduction in shirking can be greater than the cost of foregone output. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Labor Research is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Volltext ist im Gastzugang nicht verfügbar. Melden Sie sich für Vollzugriff an.