Treffer: Deep Learning with DAGs

Title:
Deep Learning with DAGs
Language:
English
Authors:
Sourabh Balgi (ORCID 0000-0002-3329-5533), Adel Daoud (ORCID 0000-0001-7478-8345), Jose M. Peña, Geoffrey T. Wodtke (ORCID 0000-0001-6424-6040), Jesse Zhou
Source:
Sociological Methods & Research. 2025 54(4):1624-1682.
Availability:
SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed:
Y
Page Count:
59
Publication Date:
2025
Sponsoring Agency:
National Science Foundation (NSF)
Contract Number:
2015613
Document Type:
Fachzeitschrift Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
Education Level:
Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
DOI:
10.1177/00491241251319291
ISSN:
0049-1241
1552-8294
Entry Date:
2025
Accession Number:
EJ1485754
Database:
ERIC

Weitere Informationen

Social science theories often postulate systems of causal relationships among variables, which are commonly represented using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). As non-parametric causal models, DAGs require no assumptions about the functional form of the hypothesized relationships. Nevertheless, to simplify empirical evaluation, researchers typically invoke such assumptions anyway, even though they are often arbitrary and do not reflect any theoretical content or prior knowledge. Moreover, functional form assumptions can engender bias, whenever they fail to accurately capture the true complexity of the system. In this article, we introduce causal-graphical normalizing flows (cGNFs), a novel approach to causal inference that leverages deep neural networks to empirically evaluate theories represented as DAGs. Unlike conventional methods, cGNFs model the full joint distribution of the data using a DAG specified by the analyst, without relying on stringent assumptions about functional form. This enables flexible, non-parametric estimation of any causal estimand identified from the DAG, including total effects, direct and indirect effects, and path-specific effects. We illustrate the method with a reanalysis of Blau and Duncan's (1967) model of status attainment and Zhou's (2019) model of controlled mobility. The article concludes with a discussion of current limitations and directions for future development.

As Provided