Treffer: Informe complementario: Análisis estadístico comparativo multifuente para Presupuesto Base Cero. Informe 16-IC (131/138)

Title:
Informe complementario: Análisis estadístico comparativo multifuente para Presupuesto Base Cero. Informe 16-IC (131/138)
Authors:
Anez, Diomar, orcid:0000-0002-7925-, Anez, Dimar
Publisher Information:
Solidum Producciones
Publication Year:
2025
Collection:
Zenodo
Subject Terms:
Zero-Base Budgeting (ZBB), Multi-source analysis, Statistical analysis, Comparative analysis, Management tools, Management fads, Lifecycle analysis, Google Trends, Google Books Ngram, Crossref, Bain & Company, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Correlation analysis, Regression analysis, Temporal analysis, Managerial adoption, User satisfaction, Academic discourse, Data ecosystem, Decoupling
Document Type:
Buch book
Language:
Spanish; Castilian
Relation:
https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/management-fads; https://github.com/Wise-Connex/Management-Tools-Analysis.git; https://zenodo.org/records/15339346; oai:zenodo.org:15339346; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15339346
DOI:
10.5281/zenodo.15339346
Availability:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15339346
https://zenodo.org/records/15339346
Rights:
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International ; cc-by-nc-4.0 ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode
Accession Number:
edsbas.3491396F
Database:
BASE

Weitere Informationen

This technical report presents a multi-source comparative statistical analysis of Zero-Base Budgeting (ZBB) to provide a holistic view of its evolution and relevance. The study utilizes five distinct data sources: Google Trends (public interest), Google Books Ngram (literary/academic presence), Crossref.org (formal academic publications), and Bain & Company surveys (managerial usability and satisfaction). The analysis reveals that ZBB has a dual life, characterized by two separate and distinct life cycles: an academic and literary boom-and-bust cycle in the 1970s, and a successful, modern practical resurgence beginning around 2015.Key findings from Principal Component Analysis (PCA) identify two statistically independent dimensions: 1) a "Managerial Adoption and Valuation" dimension, driven exclusively by recent, exponential growth in Bain's usability and satisfaction data, and 2) a "Historical Academic Discourse" dimension, defined by the cyclical trajectory in Google Books Ngrams. Correlation analysis confirms this structure, showing a near-perfect positive correlation between usability and satisfaction, and a significant negative correlation between the historical literary discourse and modern practical application. Public interest, as measured by Google Trends, and formal academic research from Crossref appear largely disconnected from these two dominant dynamics. The report concludes that ZBB is not a simple, monolithic management fad but a resilient "Evolutive/Persistent Cyclic Pattern" that has transformed from a theoretical concept into a pragmatic solution, demonstrating a significant decoupling between its academic history and its modern practical revival. ; Title (English): Complementary Report: Multi-source Comparative Statistical Analysis for Zero-Base Budgeting. Report 16-IC (131/138) © 2025, Diomar G. Añez B., y Dimar J. Añez B. Repository: https://github.com/Wise-Connex/Management-Tools-Analysis.git Programming Language: Python Development Status: Active