Treffer: A collaborative iterated greedy algorithm with reinforcement learning for energy-aware distributed blocking flow-shop scheduling.

Title:
A collaborative iterated greedy algorithm with reinforcement learning for energy-aware distributed blocking flow-shop scheduling.
Authors:
Bao, Haizhu1 (AUTHOR), Pan, Quanke1,2 (AUTHOR) panquanke@shu.edu.cn, Ruiz, Rubén3 (AUTHOR), Gao, Liang4 (AUTHOR)
Source:
Swarm & Evolutionary Computation. Dec2023, Vol. 83, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Database:
Supplemental Index

Weitere Informationen

• An energy- aware distributed blocking flow-shop scheduling is investigated. • The theoretical properties of EDBFSP-SDST are explored. • A bi-population cooperative IG with two levels Q-learning is proposed to address the EDBFSP-SDST. • An energy-saving strategy and an acceleration strategy based on knowledge are proposed. • The EDBFSP-SDST is presented and modeled by using a MILP model. Energy-aware scheduling has attracted increasing attention mainly due to economic benefits as well as reducing the carbon footprint at companies. In this paper, an energy-aware scheduling problem in a distributed blocking flow-shop with sequence-dependent setup times is investigated to minimize both makespan and total energy consumption. A mixed-integer linear programming model is constructed and a cooperative iterated greedy algorithm based on Q-learning (CIG) is proposed. In the CIG, a top-level Q-learning is focused on enhancing the utilization ratio of machines to minimize makespan by finding a scheduling policy from four sequence-related operations. A bottom-level Q-learning is centered on improving energy efficiency to reduce total energy consumption by learning the optimal speed governing policy from four speed-related operations. According to the structure characteristics of solutions, several properties are explored to design an energy-saving strategy and acceleration strategy. The experimental results and statistical analysis prove that the CIG is superior to the state-of-the-art competitors with improvement percentages of 20.16 % over 2880 instances from the well-known benchmark set in the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]