Treffer: Beyond the Wrist: Finger-Worn Accelerometers Enhance Assessment of Post-Stroke Motor Performance.
Original Publication: New York, NY : Demos Medical Pub., c1999-
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2019 Mar;23(2):599-606. (PMID: 29994103)
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(9):853-7. (PMID: 26146964)
Disabil Rehabil. 1999 Aug;21(8):372-7. (PMID: 10503978)
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Jan 29;22(1):14. (PMID: 39881332)
Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):2929-2939. (PMID: 39198348)
Stroke. 2011 May;42(5):1482-8. (PMID: 21474812)
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017 Jan;55(1):141-150. (PMID: 27106757)
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Mar;31(3):290-300. (PMID: 27909071)
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31. (PMID: 1135616)
Rehabil Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):78-90. (PMID: 26009865)
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024 Sep;38(9):659-669. (PMID: 39109662)
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2014 Nov;18(6):1804-12. (PMID: 25014974)
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(10):969-78. (PMID: 25896988)
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;93(3):245-52. (PMID: 24398579)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Sep;173:111422. (PMID: 38849061)
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 20;17(10):e0274142. (PMID: 36264782)
Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4(4):483-92. (PMID: 7333761)
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2023 Jan 1;47(1):16-25. (PMID: 35930404)
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Aug;94(8):1527-33. (PMID: 23529144)
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 13;12(1):11958. (PMID: 35831446)
J Hand Ther. 2011 Jul-Sep;24(3):257-64; quiz 265. (PMID: 21420279)
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jan 6;3:1. (PMID: 31934645)
Stroke. 2000 Mar;31(3):662-7. (PMID: 10700501)
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Oct;22(5):1059-76. (PMID: 8865616)
Lancet Neurol. 2009 Aug;8(8):741-54. (PMID: 19608100)
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 28;9(7):e103135. (PMID: 25068258)
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):e347-e913. (PMID: 38264914)
Weitere Informationen
BackgroundAccurate and objective assessment of motor performance is critical for effective stroke rehabilitation. While wrist-worn accelerometers are widely accepted as a valid tool for evaluating upper-limb motor performance, they primarily capture arm and forearm movements, overlooking hand and finger activity. This limitation reduces their ability to detect changes in distal function, hindering the broader integration of wearable-based motor performance metrics into clinical practice.ObjectiveTo determine whether finger-worn accelerometers, which capture both proximal and distal movements of the upper limbs, offer a more comprehensive assessment of motor performance by comparing their convergent validity with that of wrist-worn accelerometers.MethodsBilateral accelerometer data were collected from 24 stroke survivors using finger-worn and wrist-worn devices as they performed unscripted daily activities in a simulated home environment. Motor performance metrics from both sensor locations were analyzed for correlations with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and sensitivity to differences in motor performance across impairment levels.ResultsFinger-worn accelerometer metrics showed stronger correlations with FMA-UE scores than those from wrist-worn sensors, largely due to their ability to capture fine hand movements. Additionally, finger-worn sensors demonstrated greater sensitivity in detecting performance differences between mildly and moderately impaired individuals.ConclusionsBy capturing both proximal and distal movements, finger-worn accelerometers demonstrate stronger convergent validity with standardized measures of post-stroke motor impairment compared to wrist-worn accelerometers. These findings highlight their potential for providing a more comprehensive assessment of motor performance in stroke survivors.
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.