Treffer: Remote usability testing in healthcare: Evaluating tools and technologies from afar.

Title:
Remote usability testing in healthcare: Evaluating tools and technologies from afar.
Authors:
Milloy S; Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada., Dembicki J; Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Source:
Healthcare management forum [Healthc Manage Forum] 2026 Jan; Vol. 39 (1), pp. 22-27. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Jul 05.
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Sage Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8805307 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2352-3883 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 08404704 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Healthc Manage Forum Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2015- : Thousand Oaks, California : Sage
Original Publication: Ottawa : Foundation of the Canadian College of Health Service Executives
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20250705 Date Completed: 20251216 Latest Revision: 20251216
Update Code:
20251217
DOI:
10.1177/08404704251355207
PMID:
40616595
Database:
MEDLINE

Weitere Informationen

In healthcare settings, frustrating and confusing product and system designs can lead to use errors that can negatively impact patient safety. Usability testing is an established and widely used human factors evaluation method which can be employed to assess ease of use. In a usability test, participants complete simulated tasks using a product or system, and insights gained from their interactions are used to inform design changes. COVID-19, cost savings, and reduced travel have driven the expansion of remote usability beyond more traditional in-person testing. Two project examples are used to showcase how remote usability testing can be applied to both a dynamic web-based patient safety reporting system and a static clinical cognitive aid. Next, the benefits and pitfalls of remote usability testing, and when the method can be utilized effectively, are examined. Finally, strategies for using videoconferencing platforms to successfully evaluate various healthcare products and systems are shared.

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.