Treffer: Safety validation for connected autonomous vehicles using large-scale testing tracks in high-fidelity simulation environment.

Title:
Safety validation for connected autonomous vehicles using large-scale testing tracks in high-fidelity simulation environment.
Authors:
Xu Z; Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia. Electronic address: Zheng.xu3@monash.edu., Wang X; College of Transport and Communications, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China., Wang X; School of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China., Zheng N; Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Source:
Accident; analysis and prevention [Accid Anal Prev] 2025 Jun; Vol. 215, pp. 108011. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Mar 18.
Publication Type:
Journal Article; Validation Study
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Pergamon Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 1254476 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1879-2057 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00014575 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Accid Anal Prev Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Oxford : Pergamon Press
Original Publication: [New York, Pergamon Press]
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Autonomous driving system; Connected autonomous vehicles; High-fidelity simulation; Large-scale testing tracks; Safety validation
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20250319 Date Completed: 20250407 Latest Revision: 20250407
Update Code:
20250408
DOI:
10.1016/j.aap.2025.108011
PMID:
40107085
Database:
MEDLINE

Weitere Informationen

Public concern over the implementation of Connect Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) remains a significant issue, and safety validation for CAVs remains a critical challenge due to the limitations of existing testing methods. While real-world testing is crucial, it can be expensive, time-consuming, and potentially impractical for evaluating the operation of CAV fleets. This paper presents a comprehensive co-simulation framework integrating the fully compiled CARLA with traffic microsimulation to establish a large-scale (20 × 20 km <sup>2</sup> ) testing environment for systematic CAV safety validation. The framework encompasses three key components: 1) a high-fidelity testing environment featuring diverse road geometries and dynamic conditions including weather variations and realistic traffic flows; 2) an intelligent CAV function developed through deep reinforcement learning and enhanced with utility-based connectivity strategies; 3) A sophisticated safety measurement metric that utilizes surrogate safety assessments, integrating a multi-type Bayesian hierarchical model to comprehensively evaluate risk factors and incident probabilities. The case study assessed CAV penetration rates ranging from 0 % to 100 %, identifying an optimal safety performance at a 70 % penetration rate, which resulted in an 86.05 % reduction in accident rates compared to conventional driving scenarios. This optimal safety level was effectively achieved in rural and suburban areas, where the average conflict probability was 0.4. However, in transition zones that connect high-, medium-, and low-density areas, significant traffic conflicts persisted even at this optimal penetration rate, with a conflict probability exceeding 0.7. Key results highlight critical safety patterns under optimal conditions, revealing that roundabouts and signalized intersections account for over 70 % of conflicts involving CAVs. This work advances CAV safety validation by providing a more realistic, large-scale testing environment that compensates for real-world testing limitations and allows for comprehensive safety evaluations across diverse scenarios.
(Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.