• Comparison of graphic user int...

Treffer: Comparison of graphic user interfaces for computer-aided detection in Barrett's neoplasia.

Title:
Comparison of graphic user interfaces for computer-aided detection in Barrett's neoplasia.
Authors:
Jukema JB; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Jong MR; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Kusters CHJ; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands., van Eyck van Heslinga R; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Boers TGW; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands., Jaspers TJM; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands., Fockens KN; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., van der Putten JA; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands., Pouw RE; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Duits LC; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., van der Sommen F; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands., de With PH; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands., de Groof AJ; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Bergman JJ; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.j.bergman@amsterdamumc.nl.
Corporate Authors:
BONS-AI Consortium
Source:
Gastrointestinal endoscopy [Gastrointest Endosc] 2025 Nov; Vol. 102 (5), pp. 662-670. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Feb 28.
Publication Type:
Journal Article; Comparative Study
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Mosby Yearbook Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0010505 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1097-6779 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00165107 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Gastrointest Endosc Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: St Louis, Mo : Mosby Yearbook
Original Publication: Denver.
MeSH Terms:
Barrett Esophagus*/pathology , Barrett Esophagus*/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms*/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms*/pathology , User-Computer Interface* , Esophagoscopy*/methods , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted*/methods , Computer Graphics* , Adenocarcinoma*/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma*/pathology, Humans ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Video Recording ; Female ; Male
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20250302 Date Completed: 20251017 Latest Revision: 20251022
Update Code:
20251022
DOI:
10.1016/j.gie.2025.02.040
PMID:
40024289
Database:
MEDLINE

Weitere Informationen

Background and Aims: Human-computer interaction, particularly the graphic user interface (GUI) for displaying detection results, is an important but underexplored aspect of computer-aided detection (CADe) systems in endoscopy. We explored whether the use of a bounding box GUI or a heatmap GUI resulted in different performance of endoscopists when using CADe for Barrett's neoplasia.
Methods: Thirty-seven endoscopists from 6 countries with varying expertise assessed 70 Barrett's esophagus videos. All videos were evaluated by our previously developed CADe system and comprised, at some point, a CADe detection, whether the video contained neoplasia or not. The study had 2 phases. Initially, videos were shown with either a bounding box or heatmap. Then, after a 2-week washout, the same videos were reordered and displayed with the alternate GUI. Endoscopists marked perceived neoplastic lesions and biopsy sampling sites, also noting their subjective GUI preference. Primary endpoints were objective classification and localization performance, whereas the secondary endpoint was the subjective preference.
Results: No statistically significant difference in classification performance was found when endoscopists were provided with the bounding box or the heatmap visualization (sensitivity, 83% vs 83% [P = .29]; specificity, 86% vs 86% [P = .09]). Also, the comparison of localization accuracy between the bounding box and heatmap methods showed no significant differences, with both methods yielding a median score of 97%. Subjectively, 23 endoscopists preferred the heatmap and 14 the bounding box (P = .04).
Conclusions: Although endoscopists expressed a preference for the heatmap GUI, this was not associated with a statistical difference in performance outcomes.
(Copyright © 2025 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: R. E. Pouw: Consultant for Medtronic and MicroTech; speaker for Pentax Medical. F. van der Sommen, P. H. de With, A. J. de Groof: Research support from Olympus. J. J. Bergman: Research support from Olympus, C2 Therapeutics/Pentax, Medtronic, Aqua Medical. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.