Result: Development and Implementation of a Structured and Innovative Faculty-Wide Mentorship Program for a Large Department of Psychiatry.
Original Publication: [Washington, DC : American Psychiatric Press, c1989-
Womack VY, Wood CV, House SC, Quinn SC, Thomas SB, McGee R, et al. Culturally aware mentorship: lasting impacts of a novel intervention on academic administrators and faculty. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0236983. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236983327647687413486)
McRae M, Zimmerman KM. Identifying components of success within health sciences-focused mentoring programs through a review of the literature. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(1):6976. (PMID: 10.5688/ajpe6976308947746418850)
Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusic A. A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(1):72–8. (PMID: 10.1007/s11606-009-1165-819924490)
Spence JP, Buddenbaum JL, Bice PJ, Welch JL, Carroll AE. Independent investigator incubator (I 3 ): a comprehensive mentorship program to jumpstart productive research careers for junior faculty. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):186. (PMID: 10.1186/s12909-018-1290-3300818996080403)
Walensky RP, Kim Y, Chang Y, Porneala BC, Bristol MN, Armstrong K, et al. The impact of active mentorship: results from a survey of faculty in the Department of Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):108. (PMID: 10.1186/s12909-018-1191-5297517965948924)
Byars-Winston A, Womack VY, Butz AR, McGee R, Quinn SC, Utzerath E, et al. Pilot study of an intervention to increase cultural awareness in research mentoring: implications for diversifying the scientific workforce. J Clin Transl Sci. 2018;2(2):86–94. (PMID: 10.1017/cts.2018.25303381316191051)
Choi AMK, Moon JE, Steinecke A, Prescott JE. Developing a culture of mentorship to strengthen academic medical centers. Acad Med. 2019;94(5):630–3. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.000000000000249831026234)
Borlik MF, Godoy SM, Wadell PM, Petrovic-Dovat L, Cagande CC, Hajirnis A, et al. Women in Academic Psychiatry: inequities, barriers, and promising solutions. Acad Psychiatry. 2021;45(1):110–9. (PMID: 10.1007/s40596-020-01389-533532916)
Fang D, Moy E, Colburn L, Hurley J. Racial and ethnic disparities in faculty promotion in academic medicine. JAMA. 2000;284(9):1085–92. (PMID: 10.1001/jama.284.9.108510974686)
Rodríguez JE, Campbell KM, Mouratidis RW. Where are the rest of us? Improving representation of minority faculty in academic medicine. South Med J. 2014;107(12):739–44. (PMID: 10.14423/SMJ.000000000000020425502149)
Eby LT, Allen TD, Hoffman BJ, Baranik LE, Sauer JB, Baldwin S, et al. An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. Psychol Bull. 2013;139(2):441–76. (PMID: 10.1037/a002927922800296)
Blake-Beard S, Bayne ML, Crosby FJ, Muller CB. Matching by race and gender in mentoring relationships: keeping our eyes on the prize. J Soc Issues. 2011;67(3):622–43. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01717.x)
Farkas AH, Bonifacino E, Turner R, Tilstra SA, Corbelli JA. Mentorship of women in academic medicine: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(7):1322–9. (PMID: 10.1007/s11606-019-04955-2310375456614283)
Nowell L, Norris JM, Mrklas K, White DE. A literature review of mentorship programs in academic nursing. J Prof Nurs. 2017;33(5):334–44. (PMID: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.02.00728931480)
Perry RE, Parikh JR. Mentorship of junior faculty members in academic radiology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(10):1341–4. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.04.02028579191)
Burgess A, van Diggele C, Mellis C. Mentorship in the health professions: a review. Clin Teach. 2018;15(3):197–202. (PMID: 10.1111/tct.1275629318730)
Meyers DC, Durlak JA, Wandersman A. The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50(3–4):462–80. (PMID: 10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x22644083)
Wandersman A, Chien VH, Katz J. Toward an evidence-based system for innovation support for implementing innovations with quality: tools, training, technical assistance, and quality assurance/quality improvement. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50(3–4):445–59. (PMID: 10.1007/s10464-012-9509-722538406)
Efstathiou JA, Drumm MR, Paly JP, Lawton DM, O’Neill RM, Niemierko A, et al. Long-term impact of a faculty mentoring program in academic medicine. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207634. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207634304961996264475)
Hill SEM, Ward WL, Seay A, Buzenski J. The nature and evolution of the mentoring relationship in academic health centers. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2022;29(3):557–69. (PMID: 10.1007/s10880-022-09893-6357610339243938)
Henry-Noel N, Bishop M, Gwede CK, Petkova E, Szumacher E. Mentorship in medicine and other health professions. J Cancer Educ. 2019;34(4):629–37. (PMID: 10.1007/s13187-018-1360-629691796)
Ssemata AS, Gladding S, John CC. Kiguli, A Developing mentorship in a resource-limited context: a qualitative research study of the experiences and perceptions of the makerere university student and faculty mentorship programme. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:123. (PMID: 10.1186/s12909-017-0962-8287094645513376)
Further Information
Objectives: Mentorship supports faculty to succeed in their careers with confidence, resilience, and satisfaction. To address inequities evident with an informal approach, a formal mentorship program was designed and implemented.
Methods: The Quality Implementation Framework (QIF) was applied. Engagement with key stakeholders and users was emphasized. The goals of the program are to address inequities and create greater satisfaction with academic careers among diverse faculty working in various roles/sites. A central component is a primary 1:1 mentor/mentee model, supported with an online matching tool. 1:1 mentorship is augmented with several group mentorships, to support specific academic roles (e.g., clinician scientists; clinician teachers) or social identity. Mentorship training workshops and resources support mentors/mentees; topics include best practices, DEI, and mentorship and mentorship tools. Descriptive statistics (means, SDs, percentages) summarized findings on mentees/mentors at enrollment.
Results: Sixty-six mentors registered. Recently hired faculty (n = 136) were invited to participate, resulting in 105 mentees (77%). There is a significant improvement in mentor perception of the department's culture of mentorship (t(198) = 4.188, p < 0.001). Key mentee goals were to gain career guidance and support, information on academic promotion, skills in professional relationships, and networking. Identified challenges among mentors/mentees include having differing goals, time commitment, and managing difficult conversations. Mentorship groups were well-received with high satisfaction.
Conclusions: Uptake and participation is encouraging. QIF will help identify contextual factors related to uptake and use of the program and additional implementation strategies needed. The project will contribute to literature on implementation and sustainability of mentorship programs.
(© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Academic Psychiatry, LLC.)
Declarations. Consent to participate is not applicable for this Education Case Report. The program described in the paper was conceptualized as a quality improvement initiative for the Department and therefore had ethical (IRB) exemption. Consent for publication is not applicable. The needs assessment data (which are being presented in a future paper) and data presented here are available upon request. Disclosure: On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.