Result: Practical implications of using non-relational databases to store large genomic data files and novel phenotypes.
Original Publication: Hamburg : P. Parey, c1985-
Chesnais, J. P. , Cooper, T. A. , Wiggans, G. R. , Sargolzaei, M. , Pryce, J. E. , & Miglior, F. (2016). Using genomics to enhance selection of novel traits in North American Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(3), 2413-2427. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9970.
Groeneveld, E. , & Lichtenberg, H. (2016). TheSNPpit-a high performance database system for managing large scale SNP data. PLoS One, 11(10), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164043.
Hayes, B. J. , & Daetwyler, H. D. (2019). 1000 Bull genomes project to map simple and complex genetic traits in cattle: Applications and outcomes. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 7, 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-020518-115024.
Hayes, B. , & Goddard, M. (2010). Genome-wide association and genomic selection in animal breeding. Genome, 53(11), 876-883. https://doi.org/10.1139/G10-076.
Nanni, L. , Pinoli, P. , Canakoglu, A. , & Ceri, S. (2019). PyGMQL: Scalable data extraction and analysis for heterogeneous genomic datasets. BMC Bioinformatics, 20(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3159-9.
Nicolazzi, E. L. , Picciolini, M. , Strozzi, F. , Schnabel, R. D. , Lawley, C. , Pirani, A. , Brew, F. , & Stella, A. (2014). SNPchiMp: A database to disentangle the SNPchip jungle in bovine livestock. BMC Genomics, 15(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-123.
Purcell, S. , Neale, B. , Todd-Brown, K. , Thomas, L. , Ferreira, M. A. R. , Bender, D. , Maller, J. , Sklar, P. , De Bakker, P. I. W. , Daly, M. J. , & Sham, P. C. (2007). PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. American Journal of Human Genetics, 81(3), 559-575. https://doi.org/10.1086/519795.
Reuter, J. A. , Spacek, D. V. , & Snyder, M. P. (2015). High-throughput sequencing technologies. Molecular Cell, 58(4), 586-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.004.
Schaeffer, L. R. (2006). Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 123(4), 218-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595.x.
Yang, A. , Troup, M. , & Ho, J. W. K. (2017). Scalability and validation of big data bioinformatics software. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 15, 379-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2017.07.002.
Further Information
The objective of our study was to provide practical directions on the storage of genomic information and novel phenotypes (treated here as unstructured data) using a non-relational database. The MongoDB technology was assessed for this purpose, enabling frequent data transactions involving numerous individuals under genetic evaluation. Our study investigated different genomic (Illumina Final Report, PLINK, 0125, FASTQ, and VCF formats) and phenotypic (including media files) information, using both real and simulated datasets. Advantages of our centralized database concept include the sublinear running time for queries after increasing the number of samples/markers exponentially, in addition to the comprehensive management of distinct data formats while searching for specific genomic regions. A comparison of our non-relational and generic solution, with an existing relational approach (developed for tabular data types using 2 bits to store genotypes), showed reduced importing time to handle 50M SNPs (PLINK format) achieved by the relational schema. Our experimental results also reinforce that data conversion is a costly step required to manage genomic data into both relational and non-relational database systems, and therefore, must be carefully treated for large applications.
(© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.)