Treffer: Rounds vs. Communication Tradeoffs for Maximal Independent Sets.

Title:
Rounds vs. Communication Tradeoffs for Maximal Independent Sets.
Authors:
Assadi, Sepehr1 (AUTHOR) sepehr@assadi.info, Kol, Gillat2 (AUTHOR) gillat.kol@gmail.com, Zhang, Zhijun2 (AUTHOR) zhijunz@princeton.edu
Source:
SIAM Journal on Computing. 2025, Vol. 54 Issue 5, p22-20-22-20. 1p.
Database:
Business Source Premier

Weitere Informationen

We consider the problem of finding a maximal independent set (MIS) in the shared blackboard communication model with vertex-partitioned inputs. There are \(n\) players corresponding to vertices of an undirected graph, and each player sees the edges incident on its vertex; this way, each edge is known by both its endpoints and is thus shared by two players. The players communicate in simultaneous rounds by posting their messages on a shared blackboard visible to all players, with the goal of computing an MIS of the graph. While the MIS problem is well studied in other distributed models and while shared blackboard is, perhaps, the simplest broadcast model, lower bounds for our problem were only known against one-round protocols. We present a lower bound on the round-communication tradeoff for computing an MIS in this model. Specifically, we show that, when \(r\) rounds of interaction are allowed, at least one player needs to communicate \(\Omega (n^{1/{20}^{r+1}})\) bits. In particular, with logarithmic bandwidth, finding an MIS requires \(\Omega (\log \log{n})\) rounds. This lower bound can be compared with the algorithm of Ghaffari et al. [Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, 2018, pp. 129–138] that solves the MIS in \(O(\log \log{n})\) rounds but with a logarithmic bandwidth for an average player. Additionally, our lower bound further extends to the closely related problem of maximal bipartite matching. The presence of edge-sharing gives the algorithms in our model a surprising power, and numerous algorithmic results exploiting this power are known. For a similar reason, proving lower bounds in this model is much more challenging because this sharing in the players' inputs prohibits the use of standard number-in-hand communication complexity arguments. Thus, to prove our results, we devise a new round elimination framework, which we call partial-input embedding, that may also be useful in future work for proving round-sensitive lower bounds in the presence of shared inputs. Finally, we discuss several implications of our results to multiround (adaptive) distributed sketching algorithms, broadcast congested clique, and the welfare maximization problem in two-sided matching markets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of SIAM Journal on Computing is the property of Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)